The Essential Engineer: Why Science Alone Will Not Solve Our Global Problems
Rate This Product :
From the acclaimed author of The Pencil and To Engineer Is Human, The important Engineer is an eye-opening exploration of the ways in which science and engineering must work together to address our world’s most pressing issues, from dealing with climate change and the prevention of natural disasters to the improvement of efficient automobiles and the crusade for renewable vigor sources. While the scientist may identify problems, it falls to the engineer to solve them. It is the possible practicality of engineering, which takes into catalogue structural, economic, environmental, and other factors that science often does not consider, that makes engineering vital to answering our most urgent concerns.
Henry Petroski takes us inside the research, development, and debates surrounding the most important challenges of our time, exploring the feasibility of biofuels, the advance of battery-operated cars, and the quiz, of nuclear power. He gives us an in-depth investigation of the assorted options for renewable energy—among them solar, wind, tidal, and ethanol—explaining the benefits and risks of each. Will windmills soon populate our scenery the way they did in former centuries? Will artificial trees, said to be more efficient at interesting harmful carbon dioxide than real trees, soon dot our prairies? Will we invent a “sunshade” in outer space to protect ourselves from dangerous rays? In many cases, the technology already exists. What’s needed is not so much invention as engineering.
Just as the great achievements of centuries past—the steamship, the airplane, the moon landing—once seemed beyond reach, the solutions to the twenty-first century’s problems await only a similar coordination of science and engineering. Eloquently reasoned and written, The important Engineer identifies and illuminates these problems—and, above all, sets out a policy for putting ideas into action.
Amazon Exclusive: Henry Petroski on Science, Engineering, and Culture
Science is by its very nature global. In fact, it is galactic, even universal. This is because science deals with universal laws, like the law of gravity. No matter where on earth I jump, gravity will pull me down according to the single law of universal gravitation. And no matter where an apple falls, it falls toward the ground. We believe that it has always been so, regardless of culture.
But this is not to say that practicing science is independent of culture. It is proper to speak of American science, as distinct from, say, Japanese science. Indeed, at least one Japanese scientist has taken note of the fact that his culture has yielded a paucity of Nobel laureates. This has been attributed to the deference that the Japanese culture expects of the young toward the elderly. Prize-winning scientific breakthroughs often depend on rebellion against the prevailing paradigm, not deference to it.
At the same time, the Japanese excel in technological endeavors. Their automobiles and consumer electronics are admired and bought around the world. The disciplined Japanese culture is well suited to the mass manufacturing of excellently engineered and highly reliable products. Those products that are exported fit nicely into the target culture; those that are for home consumption are distinctly Japanese.
So there appears to be a significant difference between science and engineering and how they relate to culture. A commonly cited difference between the two endeavors is that science seeks to understand what is, whereas engineering seeks to create what never was. It is wrong to describe engineering as mere applied science. There is some extra-scientific component to engineering, something often referred to as the creative or artistic component. The engineer designing a bridge does not deduce its form from scientific laws and mathematical equations. Rather, like a poem or a painting, the bridge is formed first in the engineer’s mind’s eye. It is only then that the hypothesized structure can be given a scientific or mathematical litmus test. In engineering, analysis follows synthesis--not the other way around.
It is essential that the similarities and differences between science and engineering be kept in mind when identifying and attacking global problems. Scientists and engineers come from different technical cultures as surely as Americans and Japanese do from different social ones. --Henry Petroski
(Photo © Catherine Petroski)
Available at Amazon : Check Price Now!
- To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design
- To Forgive Design: Understanding Failure
- An Engineer's Alphabet: Gleanings from the Softer Side of a Profession
- Remaking the World: Adventures in Engineering
- Invention by Design; How Engineers Get from Thought to Thing
Please Check Update Here!!
See Also : Regenerated Activated Carbon Service Activated Carbon CGC Carbon Activated Carbon
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น